{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/echr",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:echr",
 "name": "Echr",
 "termCode": "echr",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/echr.md",
 "sha256": "dcc3342fb793c4b85edd41bc7dd156b3604cc95b2b5f1deee4743828718d9b73",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 1
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2025",
    "2025"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-005",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:5541658-005",
   "text": "AI models applied to the European Court of Human Rights have achieved 97% accuracy in predicting case outcomes under Article 6, which the authors treat as evidence of their potential as judicial decision support tools rather than as replacements for judges.",
   "abstract": "AI models applied to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) have achieved 97% accuracy in predicting case outcomes under Article 6, demonstrating their potential as decision-support tools.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658",
   "datePublished": "2025",
   "claim_type": "empirical",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "European Court of Human Rights",
    "Article 6 cases",
    "prediction against existing judgments"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-015",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:5541658-015",
   "text": "Transparent, explainable models such as those built for the European Court of Human Rights, which paired 97% accuracy with digestible explanations, provide the design template for addressing legal AI's transparency problem.",
   "abstract": "Transparent, explainable AI models, such as those developed for the ECHR, which achieved 97% accuracy with digestible explanations, offer a model for addressing these concerns.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658",
   "datePublished": "2025",
   "claim_type": "design",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "systems using computational models of argument to generate legally grounded explanations"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'echr'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}