{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/epistemic-limits",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:epistemic-limits",
 "name": "Epistemic limits",
 "termCode": "epistemic-limits",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/epistemic-limits.md",
 "sha256": "822d0e3cd9f551e1c59e3d7147165ece3d08e498a83e456f4b14bb154802c474",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2021",
    "2026"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3782220-034",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3782220-034",
   "text": "Scientists do not deserve and can never earn the authority to rule on whether we should ask what meaning or values lie behind the rules guiding the universe; on that subject they have less authority than those who study spirituality, theology, morality, or poetry.",
   "abstract": "Scientists do not deserve to rule on the question of whether we should ask what the meaning is behind the rules guiding the universe, or the values they might reflect. They have less author- ity on this subject than someone who studies spirituality or theology or morality or poetry.",
   "citation": "Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, The Importance of Transcendental Unifying Values for Decentralization (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3782220",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "normative",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "questions of meaning and value rather than physical law"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "f0bf1e80c6da60a6f8ba20630562bdf1dab171ccb5267f497dc0b815113cde99",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6269518-008",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:6269518-008",
   "text": "Requiring agents to assign continuous-valued citation weights presupposes a quantification of the relative contribution of prior work that is epistemically unknowable, because knowledge production is not a linear combination of inputs amenable to precise fractional decomposition.",
   "abstract": "In practice, this quantification is epistemically unknowable. Was a prior collaborator's insight worth 0.37 or 0.62 of the current agent's work? The question has no determinate answer. Knowledge production is not a linear combination of inputs amenable to precise fractional decomposition.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Citation Honesty Mechanisms in Weighted Directed Acyclic Graph Governance (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6269518",
   "datePublished": "2026",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "citation weights required to be continuous values summing to one"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "f096ecf5b41bb9ae8642facd54b9149c7b594de53a1cc32718a4d806b772f88f",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'epistemic-limits'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}