{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/eu-ai-act",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:eu-ai-act",
 "name": "Eu ai act",
 "termCode": "eu-ai-act",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/eu-ai-act.md",
 "sha256": "f7c47073ee64430888bf215db96f6d539fb40d34e711aca754d8bb0cf9c53796",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 1
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2025",
    "2025"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-024",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:5541658-024",
   "text": "The EU AI Act classifies AI applications used in judicial proceedings as high risk because of their potential to affect fundamental rights such as due process and non-discrimination, and therefore subjects them to mandatory transparency, bias audits, and human oversight.",
   "abstract": "The Act classifies AI applications in judicial proceedings as \"high-risk\" due to their potential to impact fundamental rights, such as due process and non-discrimination.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658",
   "datePublished": "2025",
   "claim_type": "definitional",
   "confidence": "asserted",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "European Union",
    "AI systems used in judicial proceedings including predictive analytics and judicial decision support"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5541658-026",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:5541658-026",
   "text": "Regulation of legal AI faces a two sided failure: strict regimes such as the EU AI Act may stifle innovation, while lenient approaches such as the United States risk leaving biases unchecked.",
   "abstract": "Strict regulations, like the EU AI Act, may stifle innovation, while lenient approaches, like in the U.S., risk unchecked biases.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Morgan A. Gray, The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Law (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5541658",
   "datePublished": "2025",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "comparative regulation of AI in legal and judicial settings"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e543a2d698fcd522d4d02e034cc9ee1344d0015d2c824b40b9e05ab7c0728c60",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'eu-ai-act'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}