entity · derived
Fact selection
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying fact-selection. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 2834531-012 : The identification of which facts count as relevant or irrelevant can be distorted by the concerns of entrenched interests that find the new technology commercially threatening.
- 2834531-022 : Time pressure produces two distinct fact failures: the facts about a new technology may simply not exist yet, or regulators may select the wrong, contested, or irrelevant facts as the basis of regulat
- 2834531-023 : In the Airbnb case, the selection of the relevant facts and the residency rule that followed from it benefit vested interests, most obviously the hotel industry that stands to lose from Airbnb's compe
- 2834531-024 : The premises on which regulation of a new technology is built may not be facts at all, or at least not the most relevant facts about that innovation, as the assumption that Airbnb hosts are simply cha
- 2834531-026 : There is a systematic disconnect between the facts regulators identify as important and the actual experience and wishes of most consumers.
- 2834531-027 : The problem is not regulator bad faith: the acceleration of innovation cycles means that selecting the relevant facts is difficult even under the best conditions and with the best intentions, while si