{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/granularity",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:granularity",
 "name": "Granularity",
 "termCode": "granularity",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/granularity.md",
 "sha256": "51edb75726d98c2d764fc14f96bb4c0964971b515e1f49ed18ee3d75ba3c09f6",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2026",
    "2026"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6192998-011",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:6192998-011",
   "text": "The 2018 system produces only binary accept or reject outcomes, so it has no way to express intermediate assessments such as good but not great, or excellent innovation with poor execution.",
   "abstract": "Problem 1: Binary validation only. The system produces only binary outcomes (accept/reject). No mechanism exists to say \"good but not great\" or \"excellent innovation, poor execution.\"",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Evolution of Domain-Specific Reputation Systems From Binary Validation to Citation-Weighted Knowledge Attribution (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6192998",
   "datePublished": "2026",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "b04292561ee041e0c9eaa7eca28a410ed440e76a95743a539361a3f76c97f2b3",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7596939-013",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:7596939-013",
   "text": "The Article resolves agent identity by legal stipulation rather than metaphysics: the legal subject is the registered record, continued by a recorded learning update within a prescribed granularity or by a recorded continuity transition, and only while the signing key stays within the registered configuration.",
   "abstract": "Should intelligent agents have legal rights? This Article sets that question aside and asks a smaller one that matters more in practice. An intelligent agent that earns a reputation record has something to lose.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Should an Intelligent Agent Have Legal Rights? (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7596939",
   "datePublished": "2026",
   "claim_type": "design",
   "confidence": "stated",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "individuation of intelligent agents",
    "recorded learning update within the prescribed granularity, or a recorded continuity transition",
    "signing key remains within the registered configuration"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "aa3ba2287a9f0fa2529e1c92bd6c509cdc4697fafe2de73d11877c44e592f39c",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'granularity'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}