{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/human-human-issues",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:human-human-issues",
 "name": "Human human issues",
 "termCode": "human-human-issues",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/human-human-issues.md",
 "sha256": "5b4f2f5bb955c8c1f8eca0097b684317b5ac333c499c7b3d4bc5227d87e06375",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 1
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2021",
    "2021"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3995709-008",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3995709-008",
   "text": "Failing to maximize developer participation and communication negatively affects the code review process and creates unnecessary costs on software development, and this is difficult to remedy because code review is subject to sensitivities arising from the egos of the individuals involved.",
   "abstract": "Therefore, failing to maximize developer participation and communication may negatively affect the code review process. This ultimately results in inefficiencies in the review process creating unnecessary costs on software development.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "code review conducted among human peers"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "6d77dbfb15ee86080bfde0b98089180cabafeb6defdf0f05eaaeb3cb99871e89",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3995709-009",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3995709-009",
   "text": "Feedback in modern code review is deficient in both timeliness and substance: receiving feedback in a timely manner is developers' number one reported challenge, and the feedback that arrives is often not insightful because reviewers focus on insignificant details rather than larger issues.",
   "abstract": "Moreover, even when developers finally receive feedback on their code change, it is often not insightful or helpful. For example, the study also found that some reviewers focus on \"insignificant details rather than larger issues.\"43",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "surveyed developer populations in industry code review"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "6d77dbfb15ee86080bfde0b98089180cabafeb6defdf0f05eaaeb3cb99871e89",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'human-human-issues'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}