# Human human issues

`kaal:entity:human-human-issues`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 2 claims that carry the concept tag `human-human-issues`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

2 claims across 1 works, 2021 to 2021.

**2021**

- [3995709-008](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3995709-008) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Failing to maximize developer participation and communication negatively affects the code review process and creates unnecessary costs on software development, and this is difficult to remedy because code review is subject to sensitivities arising from the egos of the individuals involved.
  > Therefore, failing to maximize developer participation and communication may negatively affect the code review process. This ultimately results in inefficiencies in the review process creating unnecessary costs on software development.
  Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709
- [3995709-009](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3995709-009) [failure/evidenced] *(failure mode)* -- Feedback in modern code review is deficient in both timeliness and substance: receiving feedback in a timely manner is developers' number one reported challenge, and the feedback that arrives is often not insightful because reviewers focus on insignificant details rather than larger issues.
  > Moreover, even when developers finally receive feedback on their code change, it is often not insightful or helpful. For example, the study also found that some reviewers focus on "insignificant details rather than larger issues."43
  Wulf A. Kaal, How DAOs Optimize Open-Source Code Reviews and Create Open-Source Standards (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3995709

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/human-human-issues.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.