entity · derived

Hypothesis testing

6 claims across 2 works, 2014–2015.

Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying hypothesis-testing. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.

Every claim under this term

2389423-016 2014 empirical: Linear, robust, and non-linear regression models all show positive and statistically significant coefficients, and compliance costs per unit of AUM do not diminish in the sample, so the hypothesis tha
2389423-031 2014 empirical: Compliance costs per unit of AUM do not diminish in the entire sample or in the multi strategy subsample, so there is no support for the hypothesis that smaller advisers bear relatively higher Title I
2629451-025 2015 empirical: The authors reject Hypothesis 1: they find no evidence that the market reacts negatively to the N/DPA announcement and the start of the term and positively to the end of the term, contrary to the cost
2629451-026 2015 empirical: The data support Hypothesis 2: the market reacts positively at the DOJ announcement and at the start of the N/DPA term and negatively at the end of the term.
2629451-029 2015 empirical: The data support Hypothesis 3: the market reacts positively when N/DPA governance changes become mandatory at the start of the term and negatively when they cease to be mandatory at its end.
2629451-032 2015 empirical: Market reaction to N/DPAs is industry specific, supporting the hypothesis that investors in some industries are more sensitive to N/DPA effects than investors in others.