{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/injunctive-relief",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:injunctive-relief",
 "name": "Injunctive relief",
 "termCode": "injunctive-relief",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/injunctive-relief.md",
 "sha256": "232d14e068c4d647aee444f713d9b6beb8d669084bc228fb017463bd6d635c7a",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2004",
    "2013"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/617681-030",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:617681-030",
   "text": "For cross border enforcement the critical question is not whether a judgment will be enforced in another Member State but when: eventual enforcement is insufficient if a party has time to remove assets, and delayed injunctions can be worthless.",
   "abstract": "In many instances, the critical question is not whether a judgment will be enforced in another Member State, but when. \"Eventually\" is an insufficient answer if damages cannot be collected because a party has time to remove assets elsewhere.",
   "citation": "Christian Kirchner, Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, Regulatory Competition in EU Corporate Law after Inspire Art Unbundling Delaware's Product for Euro (2004). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=617681",
   "datePublished": "2004",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "EU Member States that generally do enforce each other's judgments"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e142130507ea2f5b025fd97b3f762d44ee3a7aaa82b155aab63434b85e8fd834",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2337268-041",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2337268-041",
   "text": "With private enforcement foreclosed, enforcement of the IAA's prohibited transactions provision depends entirely on injunctive relief, administrative sanctions, and criminal prosecution, all of which require public actors to move.",
   "abstract": "Accordingly, the enforcement of the IAA's prohibited transactions provision is relegated to injunctive relief, administrative sanctions, and criminal prosecution.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Investment Adviser Regulation (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2337268",
   "datePublished": "2013",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "enforcement against violations of the prohibited transactions provision"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "7075ce35282a8ee75b81ae3dec0e19f68631beae7f3c3a00ab2827538dc9e302",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'injunctive-relief'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}