# Innovation chilling

`kaal:entity:innovation-chilling`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 6 claims that carry the concept tag `innovation-chilling`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

6 claims across 3 works, 2016 to 2017.

**2016**

- [2740477-012](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-012) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Rulemakers' inability to address the regulatory issues raised by disruptive innovation will generate high levels of legal uncertainty and inconsistency, and that uncertainty inhibits innovation during technological transition periods.
  > Rulemakers' inability to address regulatory issues associated with disruptive innovation will likely generate high levels of legal uncertainty and inconsistency82 that inhibit innovation during technological transition periods
  Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477
- [2740477-015](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-015) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- The existing rulemaking process prohibits ex parte communications and insufficiently integrates brainstorming and ideas across industries, and therefore may actually undermine innovation rather than merely lag behind it.
  > the existing rulemaking process prohibits ex parte communications and insufficiently integrates brainstorming and ideas across industries, and therefore may actually undermine innovation.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477
- [2808132-014](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-014) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Rulemakers' inability to address disruptive innovation will generate high levels of legal uncertainty and inconsistency that inhibit innovation during technological transition, and technological transition is likely to become a permanent state, so the inhibiting effect becomes permanent too.
  > disruptive innovation will likely generate high levels of legal uncertainty and inconsistency74 that inhibit innovation during technological transition periods; and technological transition is likely going to be a permanent state in the age of disruptive
  Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132
- [2808132-015](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-015) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- The current regulatory framework lacks any mechanism that anticipatorily informs rulemakers of beneficial innovative ideas, and because the rulemaking process prohibits ex parte communications and integrates cross-industry brainstorming poorly, the process may actually undermine innovation.
  > informs rulemakers of beneficial innovative ideas. In fact, the existing rulemaking process prohibits ex parte communications and insufficiently integrates brainstorming and ideas across industries, and therefore may actually undermine innovation.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132
- [2808132-021](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-021) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Regulatory timing under disruptive innovation is a two-sided failure: regulating too early risks inhibiting innovation, while withholding regulation too long risks harm to consumers and markets once regulatory inertia sets in around the disruptive product or service.
  > The timing of regulation in an environment of disruptive innovation should be a primary concern for policy makers. If policy makers regulate too early, they risk inhibiting innovation; if they withhold regulation too long, they may harm consumers and
  Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132

**2017**

- [2834531-009](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2834531-009) [mechanism/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Because technological transition is becoming a permanent state rather than an episode, rulemakers' inability to address the regulatory issues created by disruptive innovation will generate high levels of legal uncertainty and inconsistency.
  > technological transition is going to be a permanent state in the age of disruptive innovation, rulemakers' inability to address regulatory issues associated with disruptive innovation will likely generate high levels of legal uncertainty and inconsistency
  Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Regulation Tomorrow What Happens When Technology Is Faster Than the Law (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2834531

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/innovation-chilling.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.