{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/judicial-capacity",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:judicial-capacity",
 "name": "Judicial capacity",
 "termCode": "judicial-capacity",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/judicial-capacity.md",
 "sha256": "74553d4d819a98f06281cb04cad49b0428788ed09d8533aa9c0238187866ae69",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 3
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 3
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2012",
    "2024"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2029983-036",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2029983-036",
   "text": "U.S. courts have only a limited capacity to integrate parties' choice of law into a post-Morrison regime for defining transaction location, and adding variables raises the risk of inconsistent case law across districts and circuits.",
   "abstract": "The complexities in the above discussion suggest, however, that U.S. courts have a limited capacity to integrate choice of law into a post-Morrison regime defining transaction location.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983",
   "datePublished": "2012",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "absent a clear mandate in Morrison and given the statutory bar on opting out"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "fde2ff611420eb283cbb49a6b681a2ae8efa2b4603ae71480e2d91483f0295f2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2348463-037",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2348463-037",
   "text": "Bankruptcy judges and the parties to a bankruptcy case may be unable to adequately evaluate Form PF data pertaining to a creditor, which limits the usefulness of that data in bankruptcy.",
   "abstract": "Bankruptcy judges and/or the respective parties in a bankruptcy case may be unable to adequately evaluate Form PF data pertaining to a creditor in a bankruptcy case.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Hedge Funds’ Systemic Risk Disclosures in Bankruptcy (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2348463",
   "datePublished": "2013",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "Form PF data as currently structured",
    "SEC and FSOC themselves have not established how to evaluate the data"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "b3682f24c0b277b3307fb9f54cd17a4e0a87b48eecba34b40e189212f20c9a22",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4957318-005",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4957318-005",
   "text": "Inconsistent application of a proliferating body of law by different judges and regulatory bodies produces unpredictable legal outcomes, which increases litigation as parties seek judicial clarification and in turn undermines public confidence in the legal system.",
   "abstract": "Inconsistencies in the application of laws by different judges or regulatory bodies can result in unpredictable legal outcomes, thereby increasing litigation as parties seek judicial clarification. This inconsistency further undermines public confidence in the legal",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, The Future of Law - Dynamic Web3 Governance (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4957318",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "where statutes and regulations multiply faster than interpretive doctrine consolidates"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "137fb77eb82111a85f0ab5581926f762a7414ae84aaf3d56e8299db670e0e0c1",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "3 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'judicial-capacity'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}