# Judicial treatment

`kaal:entity:judicial-treatment`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 3 claims that carry the concept tag `judicial-treatment`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

3 claims across 2 works, 2013 to 2017.

**2013**

- [2317580-031](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-031) [empirical/evidenced] -- Courts treat companies that executed a CIA differently from other companies, and are increasingly recognizing the role of CIAs and their implications for directors' fiduciary duties.
  > Courts, however, treat companies that executed a CIA differently. Courts are increasingly recognizing the role of CIAs and their implications for directors' fiduciary duties.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580

**2017**

- [2998033-009](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2998033-009) [empirical/evidenced] -- As of the publication of this article, a review of published court opinions showed that no court had reviewed, assessed, or scrutinized the uses and applications of blockchain technology.
  > However, a review of published court opinions suggests that no court at the time of publication of this article had to review, assess, or scrutinize the uses and applications of blockchain technology.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Innovation for Private Investment Funds (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2998033
- [2998033-010](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2998033-010) [mechanism/argued] -- Fears that technologically untrained judges will misunderstand blockchain are overstated, because blockchain is no different from other software that courts have already evaluated, and courts assisted by well trained attorneys should be able to appreciate its significance.
  > While some judges, untrained in technology and technology novices on the bench, could misunderstand and misinterpret the new technology, the technology is no different from other software that courts have evaluated.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Blockchain Innovation for Private Investment Funds (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2998033

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/judicial-treatment.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.