# Jurisdictional choice

`kaal:entity:jurisdictional-choice`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 4 claims that carry the concept tag `jurisdictional-choice`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

4 claims across 3 works, 2016 to 2018.

**2016**

- [2831040-037](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-037) [mechanism/argued] -- Consumer choice adds a dynamic element to rulemaking because once consumers opt out of a suboptimal regulatory regime, public rulemakers in that jurisdiction can adjust their rulemaking in response, creating a feedback effect for the public rulemaker.
  > Consumer choice can add a dynamic element to the rulemaking process because public rulemakers in a given jurisdiction can adjust rulemaking to consumer choice once consumers have opted out of a suboptimal regulatory regime in that jurisdiction.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040

**2017**

- [2834531-030](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2834531-030) [mechanism/argued] -- In a world where regulatory competition is the new normal, regulators can pay a heavy economic price for being overly cautious or for abandoning the attempt to establish a meaningful basis for regulation, because first mover markets capture the benefits.
  > regulators can pay a heavy economic price for being overly cautious or abandoning the project of trying to establish a meaningful basis for regulation.
  Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P. M. Vermeulen, Regulation Tomorrow What Happens When Technology Is Faster Than the Law (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2834531

**2018**

- [3117224-016](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3117224-016) [mechanism/argued] -- Switzerland's disproportionate share of ICO funds raised relative to ICO count is attributable to the fact that many of the world's most successful ICOs are launched there.
  > This can be attributed to the fact that many of the world's most successful ICOs get launched in Switzerland.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Initial Coin Offerings The Top 25 Jurisdictions and Their Comparative Regulatory Responses (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3117224
- [3117224-019](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3117224-019) [empirical/asserted] -- The comparative summaries of national regulatory responses are necessarily incomplete and require much more analysis before they can be determinative for jurisdictional choice.
  > The summaries provided below on the regulatory responses are naturally incomplete and require much more analysis to be determinative for jurisdictional choices.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Initial Coin Offerings The Top 25 Jurisdictions and Their Comparative Regulatory Responses (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3117224

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/jurisdictional-choice.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.