# Labeling

`kaal:entity:labeling`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 2 claims that carry the concept tag `labeling`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

2 claims across 2 works, 2022 to 2025.

**2022**

- [4021599-021](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4021599-021) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Merely calling a token a utility token, or structuring it so that it provides some utility, does not prevent the token from being characterized as a security.
  > From a regulatory perspective, merely calling a token a utility token or structuring it to provide some utility does not prevent the token from being characterized as a security.34 According to SEC
  Wulf A. Kaal, Securities Versus Utility Tokens (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4021599

**2025**

- [5095633-020](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5095633-020) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Automating annotation to gain speed and cost savings produces less nuanced labeling that misses the complex human judgments and context certain AI applications require.
  > Automation can sometimes result in less nuanced data labeling, potentially missing complex human judgments or context that are critical for certain AI applications.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Artificial Intelligence The Final Frontier (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5095633

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/labeling.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.
