# Legal anchor

`kaal:entity:legal-anchor`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 3 claims that carry the concept tag `legal-anchor`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

3 claims across 2 works, 2020 to 2021.

**2020**

- [3652481-016](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-016) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Applying a common legal anchor and traditional jurisdictional principles to cybernetic systems is near impossible, because the status of a cybernetic system is constantly changing.
  > Applying a common legal anchor and traditional jurisdictional principles to cybernetic systems is near impossible because the status of the cybernetic system is constantly changing.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481
- [3652481-032](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3652481-032) [condition/evidenced] *(failure mode)* -- Because a Swiss Association is a legal entity, a DAA must have a seed in Switzerland and be run in Switzerland even though its members can be located anywhere in the world.
  > Members of the DAA can be all over the world, but because the Association is a legal entity, it must have a "seed" in Switzerland, run in Switzerland.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Decentralized Autonomous Organizations – Internal Governance and External Legal Design (2020). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3652481

**2021**

- [3799320-011](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-011) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Cybernetic systems change constantly and are less amenable to jurisdictional reach, which makes it nearly impossible to apply a common legal anchor and traditional jurisdictional principles to them.
  > Cybernetic systems are constantly changing and less amenable to jurisdictional reach, making it near impossible to apply a common legal anchor and traditional jurisdictional principles to cybernetic systems.
  Wulf A. Kaal, A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/legal-anchor.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.