# Legal assimilation

`kaal:entity:legal-assimilation`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 2 claims that carry the concept tag `legal-assimilation`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

2 claims across 1 works, 2010 to 2010.

**2010**

- [1664809-014](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1664809-014) [mechanism/argued] -- Over time, extraterritorial US securities litigation may drive European jurisdictions to adopt portions of US law in order to discourage forum shopping, a form of legal assimilation.
  > portions of US law in order to discourage forum shopping.
  Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, Extraterritorial Application of US Securities Law – Will the US Become the Default Jurisdiction for (2010). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1664809
- [1664809-015](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1664809-015) [mechanism/argued] -- Assimilation of US legal rules into European regulatory approaches may itself increase transaction costs for the jurisdiction that changes its law.
  > Assimilation of US legal rules in turn may result in increased
  Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, Extraterritorial Application of US Securities Law – Will the US Become the Default Jurisdiction for (2010). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1664809

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/legal-assimilation.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.