entity · derived
Madoff
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying madoff. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 2811718-004 : After the financial crisis of 2008 to 2009 and the Madoff scandal, relatively sophisticated investors stopped accepting the slanted phrasing of due diligence questionnaires and their answers, and the
- 2811718-025 : Fund managers were incentivized to route capital to Madoff because he charged notoriously low fees for the hedge fund business, taking only transaction fees rather than fees based on assets under mana
- 2811718-026 : Funds of funds claimed to select the best managers through skilled due diligence and charged standard 2 and 20 fee structures for that service, while in reality depositing the vast majority of their c
- 2811718-027 : Madoff's reliance on large feeder funds created a massive industry of investor due diligence lawsuits, because those funds collected high advisory fees as due diligence experts yet caused large number
- 2811718-028 : Because Madoff overtly disallowed scrutiny of his secretive and unconventional practices, it was impossible for feeder funds such as Rye to perform the due diligence they had represented to investors.
- 2811718-031 : Advertising an elaborate multi limb due diligence process is no evidence that it was applied: Madoff's asset management advisers FIM Limited and FIM Advisers touted what sounded like above industry st
- 2811718-036 : Madoff related cases following the discovery of the Ponzi scheme in 2008 only partially explain the significant increase in the prevalence and importance of private fund investor due diligence after 2