{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/mutual-recognition",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:mutual-recognition",
 "name": "Mutual recognition",
 "termCode": "mutual-recognition",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/mutual-recognition.md",
 "sha256": "4c91073f98473a964ad30293da7be6502c28654c5684149451a5d415ac49c9ea",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2004",
    "2012"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/617681-030",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:617681-030",
   "text": "For cross border enforcement the critical question is not whether a judgment will be enforced in another Member State but when: eventual enforcement is insufficient if a party has time to remove assets, and delayed injunctions can be worthless.",
   "abstract": "In many instances, the critical question is not whether a judgment will be enforced in another Member State, but when. \"Eventually\" is an insufficient answer if damages cannot be collected because a party has time to remove assets elsewhere.",
   "citation": "Christian Kirchner, Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, Regulatory Competition in EU Corporate Law after Inspire Art Unbundling Delaware's Product for Euro (2004). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=617681",
   "datePublished": "2004",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "EU Member States that generally do enforce each other's judgments"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "e142130507ea2f5b025fd97b3f762d44ee3a7aaa82b155aab63434b85e8fd834",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2061166-006",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2061166-006",
   "text": "Mutual recognition of countercyclical capital buffers hollows out the national discretion the Commission proposal appears to grant: the financially strongest Member States with the largest financial sectors will effectively set the buffer size for smaller Member States whose institutions do business there.",
   "abstract": "Therefore, the financially stronger Member States with the largest financial sectors may dictate the size of countercyclical buffers for smaller Member States, thereby practically reducing any proposed national discretion.",
   "citation": "Christoph K. Henkel, Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in European Union Bank Restructuring (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061166",
   "datePublished": "2012",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "countercyclical buffers up to the 2.5 percent mutual recognition ceiling",
    "institutions with branches or subsidiaries in the buffer-setting Member State"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "43625ea260d0fc045e86d3435df50c9d0ca4abf8542e6085a6165be6653b4a7b",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'mutual-recognition'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}