entity · derived
Non transferability
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying non-transferability. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 3125822-042 : Reputation on the platform is not truly non transferable: accumulated sem tokens can be sold along with the anonymous identities that hold them, and the only check on this is the continued existence o
- 5454054-021 : Making LER rewards utility-only and non-transferable, in the manner of soulbound tokens, is what keeps them functioning as loyalty incentives rather than speculative assets and is what aligns them wit
- 5454054-023 : LER can be engineered outside the Howey test by keeping reward units consumptive as discounts or credits, non-yielding, unmarketed for appreciation, and by disabling secondary trading.
- 5454054-028 : A favorable legal assessment of LER depends on four design features holding simultaneously: non-transferability, absence of a secondary market, absence of fiat redemption, and consumptive utility.
- 5583610-020 : Non-transferability is what defeats the expectation of profits prong: because LER vouchers cannot be listed, traded, or resold, no capital appreciation is possible and their value comes from merchant
- 5583610-028 : Soulbound tokens are load bearing for the design: because they are non-transferable and bound to a specific individual, the reward can only motivate cooperation and cannot be resold for speculative ga
- 5887242-017 : Staking influence is proportional to a participant's current reputation score, and because REP can be neither bought nor transferred and is earned only through prior successful validations, the system
- 5887242-024 : Unlike fungible governance tokens that can be purchased, farmed, or delegated, REP tokens are strictly non-transferable and can only be earned, augmented, or reduced through on-chain participation in
- 6244278-009 : Non-transferability of reputation is essential because, in Akerlof's lemons terms, a transferable reputation market would let capital-rich but competence-poor actors purchase reputation and thereby de
- 6607458-034 : Reputation infrastructure adequate to computative exchange requires four elements: verification against stated objectives, a tamper-resistant accessible record, a mapping from verifications to a predi