{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/norms",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:norms",
 "name": "Norms",
 "termCode": "norms",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/norms.md",
 "sha256": "f018d7d1707e134becb1922e14e073150f01adebe30bef860d68a498be45175f",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2013",
    "2026"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-009",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2317580-009",
   "text": "Because state fiduciary duty law is permissive rather than regulatory, fiduciary standards can legitimately develop from non-legislative sources, which makes extra legal forces a proper source for shaping fiduciary duties.",
   "abstract": "Because state fiduciary duty law is permissive rather than regulatory, fiduciary standards can develop from non-legislative sources.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580",
   "datePublished": "2013",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "state law fiduciary duties",
    "fiduciary responsibilities understood as largely aspirational best practices"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "50973e1e820aef47a4e7ffdbdcb513d03f1845643fcf4fa5910e9528a0b7dac2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7596939-032",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:7596939-032",
   "text": "The dual-use result is conditional rather than general: sufficient sanctions, norms, shared collateral, review and repeated success fees all fall outside it, and it governs only the incentive half of protection.",
   "abstract": "Should intelligent agents have legal rights? This Article sets that question aside and asks a smaller one that matters more in practice. An intelligent agent that earns a reputation record has something to lose.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Should an Intelligent Agent Have Legal Rights? (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7596939",
   "datePublished": "2026",
   "claim_type": "condition",
   "confidence": "stated",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "Theorem 4",
    "proportional-share model"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "aa3ba2287a9f0fa2529e1c92bd6c509cdc4697fafe2de73d11877c44e592f39c",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'norms'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}