# Periodic review `kaal:entity:periodic-review` **Status.** derived This node is assembled mechanically from the 2 claims that carry the concept tag `periodic-review`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself. ## Every claim under this term 2 claims across 2 works, 2013 to 2024. **2013** - [2337268-036](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2337268-036) [normative/argued] -- Because investment advisers owe a duty to obtain best execution for customer orders, they ought to evaluate the executions carried out on their clients' behalf on a periodic basis. > investment advisers are subject to a duty to obtain the best execution for customer orders,103 investment advisers ought to periodically evaluate the executions on behalf of their clients. Wulf A. Kaal, Investment Adviser Regulation (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2337268 **2024** - [4957318-034](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4957318-034) [mechanism/asserted] -- Because weights adjust continuously with use, the WDAG system eliminates the need for periodic external review altogether; the system evolves toward the most relevant and effective legal norms without a scheduled reassessment step. > This dynamic adjustment process eliminates the need for periodic external reviews, as the system continuously evolves and adapts to the most relevant and effective legal norms. Wulf A. Kaal, The Future of Law - Dynamic Web3 Governance (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4957318 ## Verify Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust. curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/periodic-review.md | sha256sum **Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.