# Plaintiffs bar

`kaal:entity:plaintiffs-bar`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 3 claims that carry the concept tag `plaintiffs-bar`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

3 claims across 1 works, 2012 to 2012.

**2012**

- [2029983-004](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2029983-004) [mechanism/argued] -- Most Forum Competition turns on a jurisdiction's attractiveness to lawyers ex post: such jurisdictions ignore the preferences of transacting parties at the time of contracting and appeal only to the preferences of some parties and their lawyers after a dispute has arisen.
  > but most Forum Competition turns on a jurisdiction's attractiveness to lawyers ex post. These jurisdictions ignore the preferences of transact- ing parties ex ante and appeal only to the preferences of some transacting parties and their lawyers after a dispute has aris-
  Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983
- [2029983-005](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2029983-005) [predictive/argued] -- Because Morrison limits U.S. securities law to transactions inside the United States, plaintiffs' attorneys are predicted to look increasingly to European countries and other venues in which to file securities class actions and similar suits.
  > As a result of the Morrison decision, limiting application of U.S. securities laws to transactions inside the United States, plaintiffs' attorneys may increasingly look to European coun- tries and other venues to file securities class actions and simi- lar suits.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983
- [2029983-023](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2029983-023) [mechanism/argued] -- By approving U.S.-style fee arrangements, the Converium decision adds an important incentive for plaintiffs' attorneys to bring claims in the Netherlands.
  > By allowing U.S.-style fee arrangements, the Converium decision adds an important incentive for plaintiffs' attorneys to bring claims in the Netherlands.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Richard W. Painter, Forum Competition and Choice of Law Competition in Securities Law after Morrison v. National Austral (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2029983

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/plaintiffs-bar.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.