entity · derived
Regulatory burden
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying regulatory-burden. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 1428387-028 : Investor suitability standards are the author's preferred regulatory option because they would probably protect retail investors' interests without unduly burdening the hedge fund industry and other m
- 1558614-037 : The Dodd-Frank Act is notable for what it omits: it does not break up the largest banks, does little to help smaller and regional banks compete, and because compliance is burdensome and expensive may
- 2150377-023 : Compliance with the registration and disclosure requirements cost a majority of surveyed advisers between $50,000 and $200,000, while a significant minority estimated total compliance cost from $200,0
- 2150377-024 : The time burden of complying with all federal rules applicable to hedge fund advisers has a median of 500 hours per year, with three quarters of respondents at 750 hours or less and a quarter above th
- 2389423-034 : The results suggest that the private fund industry may be more robust and less affected by financial regulation than other financial services providers.
- 2447306-012 : Initial Form PF compliance was inexpensive for most filers: 59.18 percent of respondents put the total cost of completing Form PF for the first time under $10,000.
- 2447306-022 : Asked what the SEC should fix first, respondents named the burdensome nature and the ambiguity of Form PF as the most pressing issues, not the substance of what is disclosed.
- 2447306-039 : The measured effect of Form PF data reporting on the private fund industry is milder than the pre-adoption debate predicted.
- 2447306-040 : On the cost evidence collected here for both smaller and larger advisers, the industry's long standing objection that mandatory registration and disclosure would inappropriately burden investment advi
- 2486570-021 : The increasing execution of non and deferred prosecution agreements since 2002 has raised the overall regulatory burden borne by the corporate entities subject to them.
- 2732915-002 : The private fund industry is adjusting well to the evolving post Dodd-Frank regulatory landscape, and the long-term impact of that landscape is much less intense than the industry itself initially ant
- 2732915-004 : Although the industry adapted well to the post Dodd-Frank environment, the Act has already produced some negative effects on the private fund industry and may produce further negative long-term effect
- 2732915-017 : Industry concerns about the burdensome nature of Title IV's mandatory private fund adviser registration and disclosure requirements appear mostly unfounded, although data inconsistencies remain a conc
- 2732915-023 : Up to $100,000 in additional Dodd-Frank compliance cost is a significant imposition on a smaller private fund adviser, whereas larger and mid sized advisers can absorb it relatively easily or pass it
- 2739479-009 : Smaller private funds spend more on compliance than larger ones, both as a share of AUM and relative to operating costs, which means increasing regulatory scrutiny falls disproportionately on smaller
- 2739479-026 : If compliance hour requirements are treated as a proxy for compliance cost, the survey data indicate that the cost of complying with all federal regulation, not just Dodd-Frank, increased between 2012
- 2816408-004 : The evidence contradicts the private fund industry's claim that private fund adviser registration under the Dodd-Frank Act negatively affects private fund performance.
- 4796714-025 : Strict legacy regulation built on stable and presumptively optimal rules and enforced at the AI development stage can inadvertently stifle innovation by imposing rigid constraints before a model is fu
- 4957318-004 : Expanding regulatory oversight across sectors produces regulatory accretion, the cumulative growth of rules, which yields a complex and sometimes contradictory legal environment and burdens the very a