entity · derived
Regulatory compliance
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying regulatory-compliance. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 4529715-002 : Each DAO in the dataset was given a score between zero and ten by the analyzing teams on each of six factors: Decentralization, Work to Earn, Attack Resistance, Regulatory Compliance, Governance, and
- 4529715-007 : Regulatory compliance is the weakest of all six categories, averaging 3.01 out of 10, and Services DAOs are the only category to outperform that average.
- 5254152-015 : Higher regulatory compliance depends on a DAO adopting an appropriate legal wrapper, such as an LLC or a foundation structure, and complying with the regulations of its jurisdiction.
- 5254152-022 : The average regulatory compliance score across the sampled DAOs is 3.22, ranging from 1 to 9, and the distribution shows that many DAOs struggle with regulatory compliance while only a few achieve hig
- 5254152-028 : A DAO operating without a legal wrapper risks being deemed a partnership by estoppel in legal disputes, exposing its members to liability, as scored for Hop DAO with a regulatory compliance score of 1
- 5254152-033 : Some DAOs substitute anonymity for legal structure: without any legal registration, Olympus DAO relies on anonymity to avoid legal action, which the author scores as the weakest possible regulatory co
- 5254152-034 : Adopting a conventional corporate form in a jurisdiction that does not recognize DAOs yields only partial legal protection; Silo Finance is registered as an LLC in Texas, but Texas does not recognize
- 5254152-035 : A DAO registered in a jurisdiction without DAO legislation risks default treatment as a partnership under existing law, as recorded for Klima DAO in California.