# Regulatory sovereignty `kaal:entity:regulatory-sovereignty` **Status.** derived This node is assembled mechanically from the 2 claims that carry the concept tag `regulatory-sovereignty`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself. ## Every claim under this term 2 claims across 1 works, 2010 to 2010. **2010** - [1664809-005](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1664809-005) [normative/argued] -- Because many countries choose to combat securities fraud through government enforcement rather than private litigation, the United States should respect the right of other countries to regulate their own markets. > respect the right of other countries to regulate their own markets. Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, Extraterritorial Application of US Securities Law – Will the US Become the Default Jurisdiction for (2010). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1664809 - [1664809-020](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1664809-020) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Section 7216 could have the opposite effect of forcefully exporting US law onto other jurisdictions including Europe, even though it would be preferable for other nations to decide for themselves whether to have a class action litigation system. > 7216 could have the opposite effect of forcefully exporting US law Richard W. Painter, Wulf A. Kaal, Extraterritorial Application of US Securities Law – Will the US Become the Default Jurisdiction for (2010). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1664809 ## Verify Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust. curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/regulatory-sovereignty.md | sha256sum **Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.