# Regulatory supplement `kaal:entity:regulatory-supplement` **Status.** derived This node is assembled mechanically from the 8 claims that carry the concept tag `regulatory-supplement`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself. ## Every claim under this term 8 claims across 4 works, 2014 to 2017. **2014** - [2486570-030](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2486570-030) [mechanism/argued] -- Governance reform delivered through non and deferred prosecution agreements is comparatively cheap for corporations because it adversely affects only a small number of board and management positions. > N/DPA-related governance re- form is relatively "cheap" for corporations because comparatively few board and management positions are adversely affected. Wulf A. Kaal, Timothy Lacine, The Effect of Deferred and Non-Prosecution Agreements on Corporate Governance Evidence from 1993-20 (2014). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2486570 **2016** - [2740477-005](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-005) [design/argued] -- Venture capital can function as a dynamic regulatory supplement for disruptive innovation because venture capitalists' financial allocations to innovative projects generate feedback that regulators can use. > We show that venture capital can function as a dynamic regulatory supplement for disruptive innovation. Venture capital's financial allocations to innovative projects can provide feedback for dynamic regulation of disruptive innovation. Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477 - [2740477-018](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-018) [condition/argued] *(failure mode)* -- If rulemakers cannot adequately protect their constituents through stable and presumptively optimal rules, then regulatory supplements that facilitate anticipatory rulemaking are justified. > making it increasingly less likely that rulemakers will be able to effectively protect the public via stable and presumptively optimal rules. If rulemakers cannot adequately protect their constituents, regulatory supplements facilitating anticipatory rulemaking may be justified. Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477 - [2740477-033](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-033) [design/argued] -- Dynamic regulatory supplements do not violate the procedural protections mandated by the Administrative Procedure Act, because the full lawmaking process still applies and dynamic regulation only supplements and optimizes the existing rulemaking process. > Dynamic regulatory supplements would not violate mandated regulatory procedures in the APA135 as the full lawmaking process still applies.136 Dynamic regulation functions as a regulatory supplement to help optimize the existing rulemaking process. Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477 - [2808132-006](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-006) [design/evidenced] -- Data derived from venture capital investments can function as a dynamic regulatory supplement for disruptive innovation, because venture capital's financial allocations to innovative projects supply feedback for dynamic regulation. > We show that data derived from venture capital investments can function as a dynamic regulatory supplement for disruptive innovation. Venture capital's financial allocations to innovative projects can provide feedback for dynamic regulation of Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132 - [2808132-019](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-019) [condition/argued] -- Because rulemakers are increasingly unlikely to be able to protect the public through stable and presumptively optimal rules alone, regulatory supplements that enable anticipatory rulemaking become justified. > rulemakers will be able to effectively protect the public via stable and presumptively optimal rules. If rulemakers cannot adequately protect their constituents, regulatory supplements facilitating anticipatory rulemaking may be justified. Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132 - [2808132-036](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2808132-036) [design/argued] -- Dynamic regulatory supplements would not violate the procedural mandates of the Administrative Procedure Act, because the full lawmaking process still applies; dynamic regulation supplements rather than replaces the existing rulemaking process. > Dynamic regulatory supplements would not violate mandated regulatory procedures in the APA126 as the full lawmaking process still applies.127 Dynamic regulation functions as a regulatory supplement to help optimize the existing rulemaking process. Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, How to Regulate Disruptive Innovation - From Facts to Data (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808132 **2017** - [2957645-008](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2957645-008) [mechanism/argued] -- Supplementing the existing regulatory infrastructure with dynamic elements can reduce suboptimal regulatory outcomes, because dynamic regulation as a supplement addresses the shortcomings of the existing rulemaking framework and curtails increased demands on the institutional infrastructure. > supplementing the regulatory infrastructure with dynamic elements can reduce suboptimal regulatory outcomes.17 Dynamic regulation as a regulatory supplement can help address the shortcomings of the existing rulemaking framework and curtail increased demands on the institutional infrastructure. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation via Contingent Capital (2017). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2957645 ## Verify Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust. curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/regulatory-supplement.md | sha256sum **Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.