# Rework `kaal:entity:rework` **Status.** derived This node is assembled mechanically from the 2 claims that carry the concept tag `rework`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself. ## Every claim under this term 2 claims across 1 works, 2024 to 2024. **2024** - [4734750-011](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-011) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Without crowd control, a code reviewer can impose their own logic on the author, forcing repeated rewrites of code whose core functionality is already sound and whose dangerous issues are already controlled for. > Because the code reviewer may wish to impose their logic on the code author, the code author may be required to rewrite code over and over even though the core functionality of the code is sound and dangerous issues were controlled for. Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750 - [4734750-014](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4734750-014) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Legacy code reviews can last weeks or months, and those delays can force complete rewrites of contracts because the underlying protocol may have upgraded core libraries while the review was still running. > These significant delays can impact development and may require complete rewriting of contracts because the underlying protocol may have upgraded core libraries during the code review. Wulf A. Kaal, Code Review DAO (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4734750 ## Verify Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust. curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/rework.md | sha256sum **Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.