# Rulemaking speed

`kaal:entity:rulemaking-speed`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 4 claims that carry the concept tag `rulemaking-speed`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

4 claims across 2 works, 2016 to 2016.

**2016**

- [2740477-020](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-020) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Formal rulemaking is simply too time consuming for disruptive innovation: the speed of product innovation lets a new product reach the market while a rulemaking that takes months or years is still processing the previous product launch.
  > The speed of product innovation makes it possible to bring a new product to market while formal rulemaking in the existing regulatory infrastructure, taking months and often years of regulatory procedure, is still dealing with the last product launch.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477
- [2740477-021](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2740477-021) [failure/asserted] *(failure mode)* -- New regulations aimed at an innovative product can be obsolete before they are finalized.
  > New regulations pertaining to an innovative product could be obsolete before they are finalized.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Venture Capital as Dynamic Regulation of Disruptive Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2740477
- [2831040-001](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-001) [mechanism/argued] -- The pacing problem arises from a two sided divergence: innovation driven by science and technology is accelerating at the same time that federal and state agencies' regulatory processes have slowed down and continue to slow down.
  > Innovation driven by science and technology is accelerating, yet simultaneously, federal and state agencies' regulatory processes have slowed down
  Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040
- [2831040-005](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2831040-005) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- The most widely recognized drawbacks of traditional rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act are its lack of speed, its cumbersomeness, and the volume of litigation generated by its notice and comment procedures.
  > The most traditional and widely recognized drawbacks of the traditional rulemaking system under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) include its lacking speed, cumbersomeness, and the quantity of litigation it generates via its notice and comment procedures
  Wulf A. Kaal, Dynamic Regulation for Innovation (2016). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2831040

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/rulemaking-speed.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.