entity · derived
Sdao
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying sdao. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 3402701-033 : Parameter and policy choices for a stable cryptocurrency should be made by a decentralized autonomous organization, the Stability DAO or SDAO, which functions as a transparent, decentralized, open ana
- 3402701-040 : The authors recommend an SDAO governance design coordinated through reputation-weighted democratic governance, whose core objective is to create incentives that lead independent and selfish actors to
- 3931933-022 : Shasper governance is funded in a hardcoded way: each validator that succeeds in propagating a block allocates a fixed percentage of its block reward, denominated in SHAS, into a separate SDAO wallet,
- 3931933-023 : The same percentage of the block reward that funds the SDAO wallet also mints reputation in the SDAO for the propagating validator, with both the minting and the sharing of the pooled tokens following
- 3931933-024 : Tokens accumulated in the SDAO wallet are distributed to voting associates in proportion to their SDAO reputation score, so payout tracks reputation rather than stake.
- 3931933-025 : A voting associate's SDAO reputation score is determined by that associate's merit, level of activity, and engagement in the SDAO.
- 3931933-026 : SDAO membership is gated by a vote combined with evidence of NFT ownership and a posted performance record as a Shasper Network validator.
- 3931933-027 : Although the Shasper Network itself is permissionless, the SDAO deliberately imposes a prior registration requirement in order to push validator candidates to educate themselves about network requirem
- 3931933-028 : The SDAO performance based onboarding metric deliberately goes well beyond validator node uptime, adding criteria such as node performance, running a dApp on the network, response time to upgrades, te
- 3931933-029 : Using the SDAO, the Shasper Network lets its developer community determine by community consensus which technology upgrades to the testnet should be created.
- 3931933-030 : Peer governance substitutes for platform gatekeeping: rather than convincing legacy technology leaders and their platforms, developer teams engage their own peers in the Shasper DAO to discuss and vot
- 3931933-033 : Nodes accumulate reputation in two ways: by being onboarded into the SDAO and performing well as node validators, and by participating regularly in SDAO governance votes.
- 3931933-038 : Governance decisions such as network upgrades follow a simple vote that mints no reputation, yet reputation in the SDAO can still be lost through a governance vote because each vote follows the DEVxDA