# Self execution

`kaal:entity:self-execution`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 2 claims that carry the concept tag `self-execution`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

2 claims across 2 works, 2017 to 2017.

**2017**

- [2992962-016](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-016) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Breach of a smart contract is arguably not even possible, because the contract simply will not execute if a parameter is not fulfilled.
  > Arguably, breach of a smart contract is not even possible, the contract simply will not execute if a parameter is not fulfilled.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962
- [3017612-013](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3017612-013) [failure/asserted] *(failure mode)* -- Voting arrangements are not self executing: their existence does not relieve the corporation of observing the legal formalities of director and shareholder action.
  > Voting arrangements are not self-executing, and the mere existence of a voting arrangement does not mean that the corporation should dispense with the legal formalities of director and shareholder actions.
  Wulf A. Kaal, Shareholder Agreements - National Report of the United States of America (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3017612

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/self-execution.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.