entity · derived
Self policing
Derived node: assembled mechanically from the claims carrying self-policing. A roster, not an adjudicated definition.
Every claim under this term
- 3128900-030 : Once participants are vested through reputation, they police the system themselves, which raises security, which in turn attracts more public fees and closes the loop.
- 3782201-004 : Self policing is more effective when the members themselves hold the power, because a centralized hierarchy in which each member holds distinct powers and responsibilities is more prone to structural
- 3782210-012 : The proper solution to reputation security is to give members themselves the power to police their own reputation, because the leading experts in a field are best equipped to invent the regulations fo
- 3782210-014 : Reputation must be staked and risked on votes over work evidence, because otherwise the system suffers the Tragedy of the Commons nothing-at-stake problem; staking ensures every expert is motivated to
- 3782214-023 : A reputational system formally linked to profits makes members forward thinking and cooperative, counteracting the tendency of competition to separate them, and it also motivates members to self polic
- 3782214-025 : No centralized platform such as Amazon or eBay has been able to create meaningful and secure online reputation, because central ownership and control prevent them from giving members the power and inc
- 5887242-025 : The REP token system deliberately replaces vague, appointment-based categories of registered legal expert and stakeholder used in other proposals with a transparent, incentive-compatible, self-policin