# Signalling

`kaal:entity:signalling`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 3 claims that carry the concept tag `signalling`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

3 claims across 1 works, 2013 to 2013.

**2013**

- [kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-001](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-001) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- The nearly insurmountable standard for liability in oversight cases in the United States undermines the signalling of the expected standard of conduct, and this could have long-term implications for American corporate law.
  > The nearly insurmountable standard for liability in oversight cases and its effect on signalling the expected standard of conduct could have long-term implications for corporate law in the United States.
  Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax (2013)
- [kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-008](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-008) [mechanism/argued] *(failure mode)* -- Delaware's signalling of expected conduct is undermined when the state simultaneously imposes a near insurmountable standard for liability in cases involving breaches of the duty of oversight.
  > Most importantly, Professor Fairfax explains why, while Delaware law may signal the most appropriate standard of conduct, 15 Delaware's signaling of expected conduct is undermined if it imposes a near insurmountable standard for liability in cases involving breaches of the duty of oversight.
  Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax (2013)
- [kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-019](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/kaal-2013-acomparativeperspectiveo-019) [design/argued] -- Delaware's signalling of expected conduct could be dramatically improved by adopting a moderate rather than near insurmountable standard for liability in cases involving breaches of the duty of oversight.
  > signaling of expected conduct29 could be dramatically improved with a moderate standard for liability in cases involving breaches of the duty of oversight.
  Kaal, A Comparative Perspective on the Limitations of the Duty of Oversight – A Comment on Lisa Fairfax (2013)

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/signalling.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.
