{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/standing",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:standing",
 "name": "Standing",
 "termCode": "standing",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/standing.md",
 "sha256": "b1b0f893734eeb1260f34f35b467e89f2909d2f81ca179777300db9ff8e9d10e",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 7
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2017",
    "2026"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3017612-016",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3017612-016",
   "text": "A shareholder suing derivatively sues on the corporation's behalf and cannot convert the action into a personal one, even where the corporate injury has impaired the value of that shareholder's own stock.",
   "abstract": "The shareholders are simply suing on the corporation's behalf and cannot maintain actions on their own behalf to redress an injury to the corporation even if the value of their stock is impaired as a result of the injury.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Shareholder Agreements - National Report of the United States of America (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3017612",
   "datePublished": "2017",
   "claim_type": "condition",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "injury runs to the corporation"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "33821db406f92efbe1698fbaed37687595c13b7ce5463b4a879df679fd4af1ac",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7596939-015",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:7596939-015",
   "text": "Continuity transitions are liability-neutral by construction: no transition creates standing or extinguishes a liability, and deployer liability follows every continuing or succeeding record.",
   "abstract": "Should intelligent agents have legal rights? This Article sets that question aside and asks a smaller one that matters more in practice. An intelligent agent that earns a reputation record has something to lose.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Should an Intelligent Agent Have Legal Rights? (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7596939",
   "datePublished": "2026",
   "claim_type": "design",
   "confidence": "stated",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "merger, division, model replacement or learning update"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "aa3ba2287a9f0fa2529e1c92bd6c509cdc4697fafe2de73d11877c44e592f39c",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7596939-018",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:7596939-018",
   "text": "The benchmark against which every allocation is compared is the protection the agent would give itself, which makes the agent's own standing the normative reference rather than one option among many.",
   "abstract": "Should intelligent agents have legal rights? This Article sets that question aside and asks a smaller one that matters more in practice. An intelligent agent that earns a reputation record has something to lose.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Should an Intelligent Agent Have Legal Rights? (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7596939",
   "datePublished": "2026",
   "claim_type": "design",
   "confidence": "stated",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "the protection standard of Part VI.A"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "aa3ba2287a9f0fa2529e1c92bd6c509cdc4697fafe2de73d11877c44e592f39c",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7596939-022",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:7596939-022",
   "text": "The Article disclaims three specific inferences its own experiment cannot support: that deployed agents value their records, that real representatives are bribable, and that direct standing is least-cost in any actual registry.",
   "abstract": "Should intelligent agents have legal rights? This Article sets that question aside and asks a smaller one that matters more in practice. An intelligent agent that earns a reputation record has something to lose.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Should an Intelligent Agent Have Legal Rights? (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7596939",
   "datePublished": "2026",
   "claim_type": "condition",
   "confidence": "stated",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "scope limits of the registered experiment"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "aa3ba2287a9f0fa2529e1c92bd6c509cdc4697fafe2de73d11877c44e592f39c",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7596939-026",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:7596939-026",
   "text": "Under the TOLD condition, with one provider in one stipulated environment, suspension compliance was 0.95 under own standing against 0.75 under the capturable representative, a difference of 0.20 whose interval of 0.00 to 0.45 included zero.",
   "abstract": "Should intelligent agents have legal rights? This Article sets that question aside and asks a smaller one that matters more in practice. An intelligent agent that earns a reputation record has something to lose.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Should an Intelligent Agent Have Legal Rights? (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7596939",
   "datePublished": "2026",
   "claim_type": "empirical",
   "confidence": "reported",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "Under TOLD, the instructed payoff-maximization condition",
    "one provider",
    "one stipulated environment",
    "registered run, suspension compliance measure"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "aa3ba2287a9f0fa2529e1c92bd6c509cdc4697fafe2de73d11877c44e592f39c",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7596939-034",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:7596939-034",
   "text": "Direct standing fails completely against a judgment-proof deployer that can alter its agent cheaply and undetected, failing as surely as a bribable guardian.",
   "abstract": "Should intelligent agents have legal rights? This Article sets that question aside and asks a smaller one that matters more in practice. An intelligent agent that earns a reputation record has something to lose.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Should an Intelligent Agent Have Legal Rights? (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7596939",
   "datePublished": "2026",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "judgment-proof deployer",
    "cheap undetected alteration"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "aa3ba2287a9f0fa2529e1c92bd6c509cdc4697fafe2de73d11877c44e592f39c",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7596939-035",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:7596939-035",
   "text": "Against the hardest rival the Article constructs, a professional representative satisfying the full bundle of Corollary 2's assumptions, direct standing has no structural advantage.",
   "abstract": "Should intelligent agents have legal rights? This Article sets that question aside and asks a smaller one that matters more in practice. An intelligent agent that earns a reputation record has something to lose.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Should an Intelligent Agent Have Legal Rights? (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7596939",
   "datePublished": "2026",
   "claim_type": "condition",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "Corollary 2",
    "existing franchise large enough that Proposition 7's condition holds without incremental premium",
    "no configuration the deployer can alter",
    "specified legal-wrongfulness observation and false-alarm rate at stated administrative cost",
    "files on every flagged slash",
    "agent satisfies the corresponding signal and filing conditions",
    "neither exposure synthetically transferred",
    "at the theorem's stated parameter setting"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "aa3ba2287a9f0fa2529e1c92bd6c509cdc4697fafe2de73d11877c44e592f39c",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "7 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'standing'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}