{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/state-corporate-law",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:state-corporate-law",
 "name": "State corporate law",
 "termCode": "state-corporate-law",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/state-corporate-law.md",
 "sha256": "b9b47ec93797fa09989ee36ffacbd8f74ae9afca9c20b4b1e2f7170ecb9622f7",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2013",
    "2017"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2317580-009",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2317580-009",
   "text": "Because state fiduciary duty law is permissive rather than regulatory, fiduciary standards can legitimately develop from non-legislative sources, which makes extra legal forces a proper source for shaping fiduciary duties.",
   "abstract": "Because state fiduciary duty law is permissive rather than regulatory, fiduciary standards can develop from non-legislative sources.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Elizabeth R. Malay, The Role of Corporate Integrity Agreements in the Expansion of Fiduciary Duties (2013). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2317580",
   "datePublished": "2013",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "state law fiduciary duties",
    "fiduciary responsibilities understood as largely aspirational best practices"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "50973e1e820aef47a4e7ffdbdcb513d03f1845643fcf4fa5910e9528a0b7dac2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3017612-001",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3017612-001",
   "text": "The 1991 passage of Section 7.32 of the Model Business Corporation Act triggered a wave of state authorization of shareholder control agreements, adopted specifically to secure the validity of such agreements rather than leaving validity to uncertain judicial development.",
   "abstract": "Since Section 7.32 of the Model Business Corporation Act (MBCA) was passed in 1991, most US states have authorized shareholder control agreements in an effort to support the validity of such agreements.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Shareholder Agreements - National Report of the United States of America (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3017612",
   "datePublished": "2017",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "United States state corporate law",
    "post 1991"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "33821db406f92efbe1698fbaed37687595c13b7ce5463b4a879df679fd4af1ac",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'state-corporate-law'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}