{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/statutory-authority",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:statutory-authority",
 "name": "Statutory authority",
 "termCode": "statutory-authority",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/statutory-authority.md",
 "sha256": "034c246ac1eea719d63a6228cfddbd4eca58176236b6e7c4abd9197c00821f73",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2017",
    "2017"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2957645-014",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2957645-014",
   "text": "Section 165(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act already authorizes the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve to utilize contingent capital, so the mechanism has a statutory foundation in United States law.",
   "abstract": "Section 165(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act authorizes the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve to utilize contingent capital.28",
   "citation": "Kaal, Dynamic Regulation via Contingent Capital (2017). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2957645",
   "datePublished": "2017",
   "claim_type": "empirical",
   "confidence": "evidenced",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "United States law after the Dodd-Frank Act"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "250b10782a5ea5dece9235a7f711aee408feaf36f2e78e310d589b5ee6304be2",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2998097-002",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2998097-002",
   "text": "The 2004 registration rule failed in court because the term client was not defined in the Investment Advisers Act, leaving the SEC without authority to fix its meaning, and the D.C. Circuit vacated the rule in Goldstein as arbitrary rulemaking.",
   "abstract": "Because the term \"client\" had not otherwise been defined in the Investment Advisers Act, the SEC had no authority to determine the meaning of the term.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Private Investment Fund Regulation - Theory and Empirical Evidence from 1998 to 2016 (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2998097",
   "datePublished": "2017",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "United States",
    "Goldstein v. SEC, July 2006"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "0955054f49c7011d33c285579bb046e6b284e42755b10fd2546a728c202669d5",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'statutory-authority'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}