{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/statutory-drafting",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:statutory-drafting",
 "name": "Statutory drafting",
 "termCode": "statutory-drafting",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/statutory-drafting.md",
 "sha256": "40b167b53df344ee5c7cc6e0412b3c96fb97ee95745c41c6e935cd1e53833121",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2011",
    "2012"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1765901-023",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:1765901-023",
   "text": "On its face Section 929P(b) of the Dodd-Frank Act addresses only the jurisdiction of the district courts and does not expand the geographic scope of the substantive provisions of U.S. securities law.",
   "abstract": "On its face, the language of Section 929P(b) does not expand the geographic scope of substantive regula- tory provisions of the U.S. Securities laws.",
   "citation": "Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901",
   "datePublished": "2011",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "suits brought by the SEC or the Department of Justice",
    "the enacted text as distinct from legislative history"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "7b08b8a15f7d72b4eeed41be2d17c20428cb4727269077a6575c5d22e31ecdc5",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2061166-008",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:2061166-008",
   "text": "The authors identify a drafting defect in the proposed CRD IV Regulation: the distinction drawn by financial institution in Article 51(a) is ambiguous and the cross reference to the institution referred to in point (a) of Article 87 is unclear and indeterminate, so the provision requires clarification or amendment.",
   "abstract": "the distinction is ambiguous and requires further clarification or amendment. Specifically, the statutory reference in § 51, ¶ (a) (\"of the institution referred to in point (a) of Article 87\") is unclear and indeterminate.",
   "citation": "Christoph K. Henkel, Wulf A. Kaal, Contingent Capital in European Union Bank Restructuring (2012). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2061166",
   "datePublished": "2012",
   "claim_type": "failure",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": true,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "Article 51 of the proposed CRD IV Regulation as drafted"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "43625ea260d0fc045e86d3435df50c9d0ca4abf8542e6085a6165be6653b4a7b",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'statutory-drafting'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}