# Statutory interpretation

`kaal:entity:statutory-interpretation`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 2 claims that carry the concept tag `statutory-interpretation`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

2 claims across 1 works, 2011 to 2011.

**2011**

- [1765901-003](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1765901-003) [failure/argued] *(failure mode)* -- The plaintiffs' reading that Section 10(b) covers transactions anywhere in any security of a class listed on a U.S. exchange is inconsistent with Morrison, because the opinion turns on the location of the transaction and on the holding that Section 10(b) has no extraterritorial application.
  > This interpretation is inconsistent with the basic thrust of the Morrison opin- ion, which focuses on the location of the transactions and the fact that Section 10(b) does not apply extraterritorially,
  Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901
- [1765901-007](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/1765901-007) [design/argued] -- The Supreme Court should have summarized its Morrison holding in language matching the opinion's logic, namely that Section 10(b) applies only to securities bought or sold in the United States; the Court's summary language instead invited confusion.
  > The Supreme Court should have avoided confusion by summarizing its hold- ing in language that conforms with the logic of the opinion, which clearly supports the conclusion that Section 10(b) applies only to securities bought or sold in the United States.
  Kaal and Painter, The Aftermath of Morrison v. National Australia Bank and Elliott Associates v. Porsche (2011). SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1765901

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/statutory-interpretation.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.