# Tight coupling

`kaal:entity:tight-coupling`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 4 claims that carry the concept tag `tight-coupling`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

4 claims across 1 works, 2025 to 2025.

**2025**

- [5887242-019](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5887242-019) [mechanism/argued] -- The tight coupling of minority stakes, under which all reputation staked on the losing outcome is slashed in its entirety by burning or redistribution, is the source of the mechanism's incorruptibility.
  > The key innovation, and the source of the mechanism's incorruptibility, is the "tight coupling" of minority stakes. Here, all reputation staked on the losing outcome is slashed (burned or redistributed) in its entirety.
  Wulf A. Kaal, The UDLC DAO Operationalizing a Continuously Evolving Universal Digital Law Codex Through Weighted (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5887242
- [5887242-020](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5887242-020) [mechanism/argued] -- Tight coupling creates an exponential penalty for contrarian positions, since a participant staking ten percent of reputation against consensus risks total loss of that stake while correct majority stakers receive newly minted fractional REP proportional to their contribution.
  > This creates an exponential penalty for contrarian positions: a participant staking 10% of their reputation against consensus risks total loss of that stake, while correct majority stakers receive newly minted fractional REP proportional to their contribution to the winning side.
  Wulf A. Kaal, The UDLC DAO Operationalizing a Continuously Evolving Universal Digital Law Codex Through Weighted (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5887242
- [5887242-023](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5887242-023) [empirical/evidenced] -- In the worked numerical example, a single incorrect high-conviction bet costs the dissenting expert seventy five percent of his governance influence, demonstrating the severity of tight coupling.
  > David loses 75% of his influence in a single incorrect high-conviction bet
  Wulf A. Kaal, The UDLC DAO Operationalizing a Continuously Evolving Universal Digital Law Codex Through Weighted (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5887242
- [5887242-033](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/5887242-033) [empirical/evidenced] -- Pilot deployments in 2024 and 2025 show major amendments completing from proposal to binding integration in under ten days, which the author presents as measured performance of tight coupling when participants have economic and reputational skin-in-the-game.
  > The longest real-world examples to date (2024–2025 pilot deployments) show major amendments—from proposal to binding integration—completing in under ten days. This is not theoretical. It is the measured performance of the tight-coupling mechanism
  Wulf A. Kaal, The UDLC DAO Operationalizing a Continuously Evolving Universal Digital Law Codex Through Weighted (2025). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5887242

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/tight-coupling.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.