# Two vote model

`kaal:entity:two-vote-model`

**Status.** derived

This node is assembled mechanically from the 3 claims that carry the concept tag `two-vote-model`. It is a roster of what the corpus says under this term. It is **not** an adjudicated definition: no single statement here has been ruled canonical, and no first-appearance call has been made. Read the claims and judge for yourself.

## Every claim under this term

3 claims across 2 works, 2021 to 2022.

**2021**

- [3981021-026](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3981021-026) [design/asserted] -- Every CHARITYxDAO decision runs through a two vote model: a loosely coupled sentiment vote with no reputation at stake, followed by a tightly coupled final vote with reputation at stake.
  > i. Two vote model a) loosely coupled (sentiment) vote (no reputation at stake), b) tightly coupled (final) vote (reputation at stake):
  Wulf A. Kaal, How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Optimize Charitable Giving (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3981021
- [3981021-027](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3981021-027) [predictive/argued] -- Because voting associates can see the sentiment vote outcomes and who staked what reputation before the binding vote, it is reasonable to expect that the overwhelming majority of final tightly coupled votes will end in unanimity on the issue at hand.
  > Accordingly, it is reasonable to expect that the overwhelming majority of CHARITYxDAO's final tightly coupled votes will end in unanimity on the issue at hand.
  Wulf A. Kaal, How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Optimize Charitable Giving (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3981021

**2022**

- [4067783-018](https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4067783-018) [design/asserted] -- DAO governance should use a two vote model that distinguishes a loosely coupled vote, where no reputation is at stake, from a tightly coupled vote, where the voter's reputation is at stake.
  > 2. Two vote model a) loosely coupled vote (no reputation at stake), b) tightly coupled vote (reputation at stake)
  Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Fallacies (2022). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4067783

## Verify

Every claim above resolves to a record carrying a verbatim source quote, the sha256 of the source PDF, and a preformatted citation. Nothing here asks to be taken on trust.

    curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/two-vote-model.md | sha256sum

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of this entity node. Its sha256 is the content hash.