{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "DefinedTerm",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/unanimity",
 "identifier": "kaal:entity:unanimity",
 "name": "Unanimity",
 "termCode": "unanimity",
 "inDefinedTermSet": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/index.json"
 },
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0757-275X"
 },
 "dateModified": "2026-07-29",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/entities/unanimity.md",
 "sha256": "5545586b09bb3a468ec408050f69c20885da87b9809358d762d9639dcf96d126",
 "additionalProperty": [
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "status",
   "value": "derived"
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "claim_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "work_count",
   "value": 2
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "year_span",
   "value": [
    "2021",
    "2024"
   ]
  },
  {
   "@type": "PropertyValue",
   "name": "non_current_claims",
   "value": 0
  }
 ],
 "subjectOf": [
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3981021-027",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:3981021-027",
   "text": "Because voting associates can see the sentiment vote outcomes and who staked what reputation before the binding vote, it is reasonable to expect that the overwhelming majority of final tightly coupled votes will end in unanimity on the issue at hand.",
   "abstract": "Accordingly, it is reasonable to expect that the overwhelming majority of CHARITYxDAO's final tightly coupled votes will end in unanimity on the issue at hand.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, How Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Optimize Charitable Giving (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3981021",
   "datePublished": "2021",
   "claim_type": "predictive",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "two vote designs where sentiment results are visible before the binding vote"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "9d8bc78d119c780c96c89ce3e820f4ac8b037d39b3ade59feb4e40d46b048288",
   "status": "current"
  },
  {
   "@type": "Claim",
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/4685567-020",
   "identifier": "kaal:claim:4685567-020",
   "text": "The two stage vote is the mechanism that produces consensus: a non binding test vote reveals how every donor assesses a project, after which donors can change their minds in the formal vote where their reputation tokens are at stake, and in practice decisions are made with unanimity.",
   "abstract": "Once every donor sees how all other donors assess the given project, they can jointly change their minds during the \"formal vote\" in which their respective reputation tokens are at stake. Typically, in this form of decentralized governance, all decisions are made with unanimity.",
   "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Impact Investing Innovation - From Impact 1.0 to 3.0 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4685567",
   "datePublished": "2024",
   "claim_type": "mechanism",
   "confidence": "argued",
   "is_failure_mode": false,
   "scope_conditions": [
    "reputation tokens are staked in the formal vote",
    "the chosen WEB3 decentralized governance design"
   ],
   "source_pdf_sha256": "87fb1be89d2661967ed2b0b673fe26448ded3bc3119b122177a4fc13ae5c085c",
   "status": "current"
  }
 ],
 "description": "2 claims in the published works of Wulf A. Kaal carry the concept tag 'unanimity'. Derived node: a roster, not an adjudicated definition."
}