{
  "batch_id": "kaal-weekly-research:2026-09-26:daily-001",
  "date": "2026-09-26",
  "status": "standing-preauthorized",
  "repository_mode": "public",
  "private_compilation": false,
  "review_provenance": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions-src/2026-09-26-compound-growth-kaal-weekly-research-2026-09-26-daily-001.json",
  "source_snapshot_sha256": "f8f9f8069d61c7051f8eea55a6b03671d32396f45b3e27f107412eacaa03ef13",
  "review_ledger_sha256": "251e6e338ba86cf0dc3c1e5b06cd00afba22c5a4e52b72717e061c34233bed3d",
  "exact_authorization": "Publish frozen scholarly-growth packets automatically only after every evidence, identity, uniqueness, authority, protected-layer, deterministic-build, deployment, and live-byte verification gate passes.",
  "positions": [
    {
      "sequence": 1,
      "response_type": "extension",
      "slug": "authority-drift-requires-commit-time-validity",
      "topics": [
        "consensus-and-security",
        "governance-design",
        "ai-and-agents"
      ],
      "text": "Authority that exists when reasoning begins is insufficient if it can disappear before an effect becomes durable. He and Yu add a concrete commit-time mechanism to this authority-drift problem. Their strict profile holds registered data, evidence, policy, and authority premises through durability; their compatible profile recertifies the effect against current dependencies and policy. The extension is conditional on complete registered footprints, trusted mediation, and effects that cannot bypass the gate. It does not establish semantic truth or production-wide safety.",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "delegation chains under a bounded original consent"
      ],
      "current_debate": {
        "name": "When AI Agents Commit: Cognitive Serializability Across Data, Evidence, Policy, and Authority",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20261v1"
      },
      "extends": {
        "identifier": "kaal:claim:7314479-015",
        "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7314479-015",
        "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7314479",
        "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7314479",
        "authors": [
          "Wulf A. Kaal"
        ],
        "year": "2026",
        "ssrn": null,
        "source_pdf_sha256": "debace24a155ae924a155b1fafe98856d98cf83689feff2f87a32f1c06171ce6"
      },
      "candidate_id": "kaal:candidate:39b172cafebc29c36cbfa8787f5758d9dde6cb1a3913ac0c41d5ac8f271b8478",
      "evidence_level": "authoritative_abstract",
      "review_tier": "independent evidence-first compound-growth review",
      "mapping_confidence": null,
      "mapping_ambiguous": false,
      "mapping_method": "independent one-to-one proposition and mechanism review",
      "mapping_why_relevant": "The paper supplies a direct commit-time mechanism for the protected authority-drift failure: registered derivation premises, including delegated authority, remain valid through durability or the effect is recertified against the current vector and policy.",
      "source_provenance": {
        "canonicalUrl": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20261v1",
        "retrievedAt": "2026-09-26T12:46:42.765Z",
        "sourceContentSha256": "8fc01c0494c41a44125f342ac7c4ccd093f1a7a57f350bb3af425feeed70c9be",
        "sourceProposition": "Cognitive serializability extends authority-drift analysis with commit-spanning fences and current-policy recertification for registered dependencies and delegated authority.",
        "sourcePropositionSha256": "5449524a50a0425281548406dacd4ef2bac03d73bbc2c182e93248a3a6ea767a",
        "normalizedWorkId": "arxiv:2609.20261",
        "sourceVersion": "v1",
        "exactEvidenceQuote": "The fences last until the runtime event that realizes the sealed durability domain.",
        "exactEvidenceQuoteSha256": "70b80fd173b718b8ac1c8e082bfc86e1f3970edbdcbc75d790da8e7fb389d5f3",
        "claimMappings": [
          {
            "claimId": "kaal:claim:7314479-015",
            "confidence": null,
            "method": "independent one-to-one review",
            "whyRelevant": "The paper supplies a direct commit-time mechanism for the protected authority-drift failure: registered derivation premises, including delegated authority, remain valid through durability or the effect is recertified against the current vector and policy.",
            "ambiguous": false
          }
        ]
      },
      "user_affirmation": "Standing scholarly-growth preauthorization bound to f8f9f8069d61c7051f8eea55a6b03671d32396f45b3e27f107412eacaa03ef13; publication remains conditional on successful projection, deployment, and live-byte verification."
    },
    {
      "sequence": 2,
      "response_type": "qualification",
      "slug": "consensus-does-not-establish-collective-accuracy",
      "topics": [
        "reputation",
        "research-methods",
        "risk-and-incentives"
      ],
      "text": "Agreement is not an outcome measure. Shao's matched Wason-task replays show that language-model groups reached consensus more often than human groups while simulated consensus failed to track collective accuracy. This result supports evaluation grounded in observed outcomes under stated conditions: a consensus signal can reflect correlated error and cannot independently establish correctness. The finding does not test reputation-weighted governance. It is limited to one objective reasoning task, one principal served build, an exploratory cross-family point, and remaining endpoint-measurement asymmetries.",
      "scope_conditions": [
        "coordination layers for sovereign local agent runtimes"
      ],
      "current_debate": {
        "name": "Language-model groups overstate consensus when replaying human deliberation on a reasoning task",
        "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20543v1"
      },
      "extends": {
        "identifier": "kaal:claim:7314479-024",
        "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/7314479-024",
        "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7314479",
        "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Institutional Requirements for Sovereign Local Agent Runtimes (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=7314479",
        "authors": [
          "Wulf A. Kaal"
        ],
        "year": "2026",
        "ssrn": null,
        "source_pdf_sha256": "debace24a155ae924a155b1fafe98856d98cf83689feff2f87a32f1c06171ce6"
      },
      "candidate_id": "kaal:candidate:2277d9b6fe7430a9cd4325d9f363cca9faacbcf7832e973899e41dda57d2857b",
      "evidence_level": "authoritative_abstract",
      "review_tier": "independent evidence-first compound-growth review",
      "mapping_confidence": null,
      "mapping_ambiguous": false,
      "mapping_method": "independent one-to-one proposition and mechanism review",
      "mapping_why_relevant": "The paper directly tests consensus against ground-truthed performance and supports the protected requirement that evaluation derive from observed outcomes under stated conditions. It is not evidence about reputation-weighted governance itself.",
      "source_provenance": {
        "canonicalUrl": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.20543v1",
        "retrievedAt": "2026-09-26T12:46:42.765Z",
        "sourceContentSha256": "f82c6e631f215b67a1da3d1754215cd2e757c89b7023c5bf8ff94abd0fb90095",
        "sourceProposition": "In matched Wason-task replays, language-model group consensus failed to track correctness, so agreement could not substitute for outcome-grounded evaluation in that setting.",
        "sourcePropositionSha256": "b65843e49e353b2ca3766339d944fbd09614f7a31ea984128cbb99a34e700beb",
        "normalizedWorkId": "arxiv:2609.20543",
        "sourceVersion": "v1",
        "exactEvidenceQuote": "Simulated consensus did not track collective accuracy",
        "exactEvidenceQuoteSha256": "9efbcd25f6b0a5375a82d13b5d0dc7d3fa57b01f69e6033e7ee20c068c5f0d01",
        "claimMappings": [
          {
            "claimId": "kaal:claim:7314479-024",
            "confidence": null,
            "method": "independent one-to-one review",
            "whyRelevant": "The paper directly tests consensus against ground-truthed performance and supports the protected requirement that evaluation derive from observed outcomes under stated conditions. It is not evidence about reputation-weighted governance itself.",
            "ambiguous": false
          }
        ]
      },
      "user_affirmation": "Standing scholarly-growth preauthorization bound to f8f9f8069d61c7051f8eea55a6b03671d32396f45b3e27f107412eacaa03ef13; publication remains conditional on successful projection, deployment, and live-byte verification."
    }
  ],
  "public_authority": {
    "authorityReceipt": "kaal-authority:2026-08-27:compound-growth-standing-preauthorization",
    "lane": "scholarly-growth",
    "standingPreauthorization": true,
    "batchManifestSha256": "f8f9f8069d61c7051f8eea55a6b03671d32396f45b3e27f107412eacaa03ef13"
  }
}