kaal:position:2026-07-30-007

DAO governance should be evaluated by explicit resistance to capture, participation collapse, and collective-action failure. Token voting is an input, not evidence that those failure modes have been solved.

Affirmed commentary position. This record extends a source-bound scholarly claim but is not a verbatim paper claim.

Holds when

DAO governance systems using token voting or comparable on-chain collective decision procedures.

Current debate

DAO governance research

Scholarly basis

kaal:claim:5254152-014
Wulf A. Kaal, DAO Market Meta Analysis 2024 (2024). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5254152
Source PDF sha256: bb2052d809a4615f0f3e2526ba6416293c40d00260149ba4fe6f38addf052796

Topics

dao-governancecapture-resistancecollective-action

Provenance

Affirmed in daily-portfolio:2026-07-30 on 2026-07-30. Review record.

Verify

Canonical markdown sha256: 6d493c6fa91173121468c27b6a8bcac022bce0e8cfd12708910eba6771d5fe4b
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-30-007.md | sha256sum