kaal:position:2026-07-31-005
区块链技术用于股东权利保护的法律冲突与规制 brings decentralized autonomous organization into a setting described by the source as follows: 区块链技术通过链上数据不可篡改性与智能合约自动执行机制，为破解传统公司治理中股东知情权失灵与表决权异化提供了新路径。在知情权保护方面，其实时透明的财务信息披露机制可消除管理层选择性披露及延迟披露问题；在表决权实现层面，去中心化投票系统大幅降低行权成本，提升中小股东参与率。然而，区块链技术应用也引发了新的法律冲突：其一，去中心化自治组织DAO（Decentralized Autonomous Organization，以下简称DAO）法律地位模糊，其算法驱动治理模式与《民法典》主体制度冲突，导致责任真空；其二，代币持有者链上治理权属性不明，匿名性与股东实名登记要求相悖，形成“技术身份”与“法律主体”的分离；其三，代币集中化可能加剧 This potentially extends Kaal's source-bound claim that In a decentralized autonomous organization a series of smart contracts grants token holders voting rights, so the blockchain-based smart contract performs the function that articles of incorporation or bylaws perform in a conventional company. The extension should be affirmed only after checking the work's methods, jurisdiction, evidence, and stated limitations.
daosmart-contractsgovernance-designblockchain