{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-1431",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-1431",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Historical B320Bb86738C67B85B6C",
 "text": "Blockchain technology and corporate law should be assessed against Kaal's source-bound claim that Tying a DAO's legal existence to existing legal and jurisdictional frameworks typically requires a representative in the chosen jurisdiction, which centralizes the DAO and results in the failure of the DAO concept. The current metadata indicates a plausible connection through decentralized autonomous organization, but the defensible response is a qualification until the source text confirms agreement, scope, methods, and limitations.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "decentralization",
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "dao"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "DAO anchored in an existing jurisdiction",
  "frameworks that require local representation",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: mapping review before claim review.",
  "The literature-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and should not be treated as a settled equivalence."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Blockchain technology and corporate law",
  "url": "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1473bfa5aa9f5b3285dc3e09ad27c5347c30d296"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:3799320-003",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-003",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs (2021). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320",
  "paper": "A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of DAOs",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2021",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=3799320",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "c3dff852f2d3f04718c829a24189309a7db4d92d84f6045d3d4f562d87c03e63"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/3799320-003"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Blockchain technology and corporate law",
   "url": "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1473bfa5aa9f5b3285dc3e09ad27c5347c30d296"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "historical-backfill:2026-07-31:phase-0006",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-1431",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-1431.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-candidate:2026-07-31:b81d95ab1aaff1b1",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "mapping review before claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.3077,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: law, legal, framework, organization, decentralized, autonomous, dao, existing. Scope: DAO anchored in an existing jurisdiction; frameworks that require local representation.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "Semantic Scholar",
  "api": "https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/search/bulk",
  "query": "decentralized autonomous organization",
  "queryId": "concept:ee778ad15ea3",
  "page": 1,
  "sourceRank": 65,
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T13:58:11.476Z",
  "citationCount": 0,
  "venue": "Law & Digital Technologies",
  "publicationTypes": []
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Approved as written by Wulf A. Kaal on 2026-07-31.",
 "sha256": "7c5ff8a70ab93b7ccede2947dd2feb2df937ae0f909c3a85bbde3e4bebcfa99e"
}