{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-2364",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-2364",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Historical 94A54144F26F6E821Cc5",
 "text": "Blockchain and the Law - Legality & Legal Applications should be assessed against Kaal's source-bound claim that The first of the two core requirements the authors set for distributed jurisdiction is that the anonymity of blockchain based smart contracting be maintained as the technology evolves. The current metadata indicates a plausible connection through decentralized autonomous organization, but the defensible response is a qualification until the source text confirms agreement, scope, methods, and limitations.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "smart-contracts"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "Apply only within the source-bound Kaal claim's stated scope.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: ambiguity triage before claim review.",
  "The literature-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and should not be treated as a settled equivalence."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Blockchain and the Law - Legality & Legal Applications",
  "url": "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c3daba44a090ed7db7dbe9c45693ff82153b68e"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2992962-028",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-028",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962",
  "paper": "Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2017",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-028"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Blockchain and the Law - Legality & Legal Applications",
   "url": "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c3daba44a090ed7db7dbe9c45693ff82153b68e"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "historical-backfill:2026-07-31:phase-0010",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-2364",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-2364.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-candidate:2026-07-31:79d91ba6e9065224",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "ambiguity triage before claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.2484,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: blockchain, law, legal, abstract, our, technology, jurisdiction, blockchains. Scope: review source claim scope.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "Semantic Scholar",
  "api": "https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/search/bulk",
  "query": "decentralized autonomous organization",
  "queryId": "concept:ee778ad15ea3",
  "page": 1,
  "sourceRank": 100,
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T13:58:11.476Z",
  "citationCount": 2,
  "venue": "International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology",
  "publicationTypes": [
   "JournalArticle"
  ]
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Approved as written by Wulf A. Kaal on 2026-07-31.",
 "sha256": "b30fedde22c3e63b1f50e8f3e2183551fbc3afac32ad481ac88bf93c0dfdc46c"
}