kaal:position:2026-07-31-2399

Social Capital Consensus for Blockchains: Exploring Design Options for Replacement of Proof-of-Stake by Social Influence should be assessed against Kaal's source-bound claim that Existing blockchains and DAOs still lack genuine decentralization, and there are currently no true DAOs: Bitcoin's proof of work protocol has produced mining pools because of economies of scale and unbalanced reward structures. The current metadata indicates a plausible connection through Sybil resistance, but the defensible response is a qualification until the source text confirms agreement, scope, methods, and limitations.

Affirmed commentary position. This record extends a source-bound scholarly claim but is not a verbatim paper claim.
Holds when
Current debate

Social Capital Consensus for Blockchains: Exploring Design Options for Replacement of Proof-of-Stake by Social Influence

Scholarly basis

kaal:claim:3227967-032
Mark Fenwick, Wulf A. Kaal, Erik P.M. Vermeulen, Legal Education in a Digital Age Why 'Coding for Lawyers' Matters (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3227967
Source PDF sha256: f6e13b956f864ab32ec3305d095a35a127770327d75b3688f785cefc437d369f

Evidence and mapping

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: ambiguity triage before claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.2475
Mapping ambiguous: true

Topics

blockchaindaodecentralizationconsensus-and-security

Provenance

Affirmed in historical-backfill:2026-07-31:phase-0010 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Verify

Canonical markdown sha256: abf801b93f0bb4f142e5f378e4e89a9be9a45eb55d4ef7e6af2d0da6c1256355
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-2399.md | sha256sum