{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-2650",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-2650",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Historical 89A008E1Dc94C01Cbc28",
 "text": "Governance of Smart Contracts in Blockchain Institutions should be assessed against Kaal's source-bound claim that Because smart contracts are coded for computer programming rather than for a human observer, courts may not be able to hypothesize a reasonable human's interpretation of a given smart contract. The current metadata indicates a plausible connection through blockchain governance, but the defensible response is a qualification until the source text confirms agreement, scope, methods, and limitations.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "smart-contracts"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "contract interpretation disputes over coded smart contracts",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: ambiguity triage before claim review.",
  "The literature-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and should not be treated as a settled equivalence."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Governance of Smart Contracts in Blockchain Institutions",
  "url": "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a8ed65c3581b76c08b8b76de4cd29ef1964a9d6"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2992962-017",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-017",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962",
  "paper": "Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2017",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-017"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Governance of Smart Contracts in Blockchain Institutions",
   "url": "https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4a8ed65c3581b76c08b8b76de4cd29ef1964a9d6"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "historical-backfill:2026-07-31:phase-0011",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-2650",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-2650.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-candidate:2026-07-31:fa93daf534f5c150",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "ambiguity triage before claim review",
 "mappingConfidence": 0.2416,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "idf-weighted multi-field mapping v1",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "Shared high-information concepts: smart, contracts, code, programming, not, contract, law, courts. Scope: contract interpretation disputes over coded smart contracts.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "Semantic Scholar",
  "api": "https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/search/bulk",
  "query": "blockchain governance",
  "queryId": "concept:8d6f82bc7037",
  "page": 1,
  "sourceRank": 91,
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T13:59:00.198Z",
  "citationCount": 8,
  "venue": "Social Science Research Network",
  "publicationTypes": []
 },
 "userAffirmation": "Approved as written by Wulf A. Kaal on 2026-07-31.",
 "sha256": "447001d1013287cf46c896b1285e32e78249fcd5781faf0f242b69b7adfdedf0"
}