# kaal:position:2026-07-31-3465

**Affirmed position.** Managing Security Risks of AI Agents in Adversarial Contexts: A Conceptual Integration of the CIA Triad and Organisational Resilience for Digital Governance should be assessed against Kaal's source-bound claim that Computative Economics is not a generalization of digital platform economics, because platform economics extends Neoclassical Economics while remaining within its primitives, whereas the computative primitives differ and the equilibrium concept is recursive rather than competitive. The current metadata indicates a plausible connection through AI agent governance, but the defensible response is a qualification until the source text confirms agreement, scope, methods, and limitations.

**Status.** affirmed  **Published.** 2026-07-31

**Holds when.**

- Apply only within the source-bound Kaal claim's stated scope.
- External evidence level: abstract indexed.
- Mapping review tier: ambiguity triage before claim review.
- The literature-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and should not be treated as a settled equivalence.

**Current debate.** Managing Security Risks of AI Agents in Adversarial Contexts: A Conceptual Integration of the CIA Triad and Organisational Resilience for Digital Governance: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dfb4cd1ff3732eb0f452040877721842ec59b2a2

**Extends.** kaal:claim:6607458-038: https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/6607458-038

**Scholarly basis.** Wulf A. Kaal, Computative Economics A Framework for Economic Analysis under Computational Abundance (2026). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=6607458

**Source PDF sha256.** `75cca35350378eb8904866d068b5d2f3e1504629e6031457ce6c12152a88e3e8`

**Evidence level.** abstract indexed

**Mapping review tier.** ambiguity triage before claim review

**Mapping confidence.** 0.2292  **Mapping ambiguous.** true

**Topics.** economics

**Provenance.** Affirmed in historical-backfill:2026-07-31:phase-0014 at https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#review.

**Record type.** This is a dated commentary position that extends a scholarly corpus claim. It is not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.

**Canonical form.** This markdown file is the canonical hashed representation of the position.