kaal:position:2026-07-31-4098

Blockchain as a governance mechanism for tackling dark side effects in interorganizational relationships should be assessed against Kaal's source-bound claim that Digitized and automated trust is not a stable substitute for institutional trust, because it is experiencing crises of its own that undermine the proliferation of value enhancing internet based platform businesses and distributed ledger technology businesses. The current metadata indicates a plausible connection through blockchain governance, but the defensible response is a qualification until the source text confirms agreement, scope, methods, and limitations.

Affirmed commentary position. This record extends a source-bound scholarly claim but is not a verbatim paper claim.

Holds when

trust migrated from organizations to machines and algorithms
External evidence level: abstract indexed.
Mapping review tier: ambiguity triage before claim review.
The literature-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and should not be treated as a settled equivalence.

Current debate

Blockchain as a governance mechanism for tackling dark side effects in interorganizational relationships

Scholarly basis

kaal:claim:3266953-003
Craig Calcaterra, Wulf A. Kaal, Gopinath Sivalingam, Reputation Protocol for the Internet of Trust - Conceptual Whitepaper (2018). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3266953
Source PDF sha256: 781758dea356e55d79c73ad7f1debe7c83de398bd1cd9e0a9a6c2802f276b4c0

Evidence and mapping

Evidence: abstract indexed
Review tier: ambiguity triage before claim review
Mapping confidence: 0.2218
Mapping ambiguous: true

Topics

reputationdecentralizationblockchain

Provenance

Affirmed in historical-backfill:2026-07-31:phase-0017 on 2026-07-31. Review record.

Verify

Canonical markdown sha256: 88afad1aa8d7fa3426c723f865b97657c255d1c16f36f24e43aacd1cccc8c7ee
curl -s https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-4098.md | sha256sum