{
 "@context": "https://schema.org",
 "@type": "Claim",
 "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-5714",
 "identifier": "kaal:position:2026-07-31-5714",
 "additionalType": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/schema.json#AffirmedPositionClaim",
 "name": "Legacy Crypto Assets And Blockchain Based Legal Infrastructure Under Swiss Law  0Ce2Fe56Da",
 "text": "Crypto-assets and blockchain-based legal infrastructure under Swiss law: regulatory framework, private-law treatment and emerging challenges should be assessed against Kaal's source-bound position that Because the challenges crypto transactions pose to the existing legal and jurisdictional infrastructure are severe, including good governance in crypto transactions requires instituting governance solutions inherent in the blockchain technology itself. The external source's verified abstract presents this proposition: Abstract This contribution examines the legal and regulatory framework governing crypto-assets and blockchain-based legal infrastructure under Swiss law. The defensible response is a qualification: the source is pertinent to the Kaal position, but agreement, extension, contradiction, and scope should not be strengthened beyond the retrieved evidence.",
 "author": {
  "@type": "Person",
  "name": "Wulf A. Kaal",
  "identifier": "https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7840-1847"
 },
 "datePublished": "2026-07-31",
 "dateModified": "2026-07-31",
 "creativeWorkStatus": "Affirmed",
 "responseType": "qualification",
 "keywords": [
  "governance-design",
  "law-and-legal-systems",
  "dynamic-regulation",
  "blockchain",
  "historical-response",
  "scholarly-literature"
 ],
 "scope_conditions": [
  "The response remains limited to the source proposition and evidence retrieved in this reconciliation cycle.",
  "External evidence level: abstract indexed.",
  "Mapping review tier: legacy curated mapping review.",
  "Mapping confidence is intentionally unscored.",
  "The source-to-claim mapping remains explicitly ambiguous and is published with that limitation."
 ],
 "currentDebate": {
  "name": "Crypto-assets and blockchain-based legal infrastructure under Swiss law: regulatory framework, private-law treatment and emerging challenges",
  "url": "https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2026-0004"
 },
 "extends": {
  "identifier": "kaal:claim:2992962-006",
  "url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-006",
  "citation": "Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution (2017). SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962",
  "paper": "Wulf A. Kaal, Craig Calcaterra, Crypto Transaction Dispute Resolution",
  "authors": [
   "Wulf A. Kaal"
  ],
  "year": "2017",
  "ssrn": "https://ssrn.com/abstract=2992962",
  "source_pdf_sha256": "80b92e67594394e38af41b769327936833de8e25d6cf3def966a6ba13bc83d17"
 },
 "isBasedOn": [
  {
   "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/claims/2992962-006"
  },
  {
   "@type": "CreativeWork",
   "name": "Crypto-assets and blockchain-based legal infrastructure under Swiss law: regulatory framework, private-law treatment and emerging challenges",
   "url": "https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2026-0004"
  }
 ],
 "batch_id": "kaal-review:2026-07-31:legacy-reconciliation-0001",
 "review_provenance": "https://kaal-signal-desk.wulf577462.chatgpt.site/#frozen-batch-heading",
 "publicationStatus": "public",
 "recordTypeNote": "Dated commentary position extending a scholarly corpus claim. Not a verbatim claim extracted from the paper.",
 "isPartOf": {
  "@id": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/index.json"
 },
 "version": "1.0",
 "canonical_url": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-5714",
 "canonicalForm": "https://wulfkaal.github.io/positions/2026-07-31-5714.md",
 "candidateId": "kaal:response-draft:2026-07-31:1f18cfa26c7db37f097c",
 "evidenceLevel": "abstract indexed",
 "reviewTier": "legacy curated mapping review",
 "mappingConfidence": null,
 "mappingAmbiguous": true,
 "mappingMethod": "legacy corpus-wide candidate binding",
 "mappingWhyRelevant": "The source proposition is pertinent to the scope of kaal:claim:2992962-006; final semantic strength requires human review.",
 "sourceProvenance": {
  "source": "Crossref REST API",
  "endpoint": "https://api.crossref.org/works/10.2478/bjes-2026-0004",
  "status": 200,
  "legacyEvidenceLevel": "abstract reviewed",
  "sourceLayer": "scholarly work",
  "provider": "Crossref",
  "providerId": "10.2478/bjes-2026-0004",
  "sourceIdentityKey": "doi:10.2478/bjes-2026-0004",
  "retrievedAt": "2026-07-31T17:48:21.820Z",
  "sourceMetadataSha256": "add252ede9417a6a05eb78df145dd7190cb9a82ab072a92c4a32c1e65ff1e80e",
  "sourceContentSha256": "e6af79fce2a0b0eeb7f3fe56242c96f83872bcba7ab601f9142ee47d153e5d74",
  "sourceProposition": "Abstract This contribution examines the legal and regulatory framework governing crypto-assets and blockchain-based legal infrastructure under Swiss law."
 },
 "userAffirmation": "I affirm batch kaal-review:2026-07-31:legacy-reconciliation-0001, SHA-256 1f3dcd62332f12880cc3432ab8f2df0ba0b52bbf3db528ab15bff9b620296e35, as written and authorize publication of all 52 response claims on my canonical property, preserving their evidence levels, ambiguity labels, and the unchanged 5,033 scholarly claims.",
 "sha256": "8db5ff6064f8a13b3404fcbe7a817ce2e195c4e8f7723af9eb2920f95f2f008c"
}